Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1953No. 39,342PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original action in quo warranto commenced on October 8, 1953, in which the state challenges the validity of an ordinance of the city of Topeka annexing certain territory and seeks to have the city ousted from exercising illegal power in making, the annexation.

As the matter is submitted to us on a demurrer to the petition, there is no dispute of facts. Before taking up the specific allegations of the petition, we note that exhibits attached to the petitions and plats in the briefs show that prior to the passage of the ordinance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Hurla v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Linn County Bank v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Blevins v. HiebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Capital Electric Line Builders, Inc. v. LennenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API