Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2003No. 02-CM-271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Angelo Jones, appeals his conviction at a bench trial of simple assault arising out of an apparent domestic dispute. D.C.Code § 22-504 (1981). He raises three arguments for reversal. We affirm.

1. Insufficiency of the evidence: We review this assertion under the oft-repeated and well-established standard, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and recognizing the factfinder’s role in weighing the evidence, determining the credibility of witnesses, and drawing justifiable inferences from the evidence. See, e.g., Lewis v. United States, 767 A.2d 219, 222…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Odemns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Reyes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Stancil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Simmons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API