Legal Opinion
Hill v. Medlantic Health Care Group
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 2007No. 05-CV-776, 05-CV-806PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, Vincent and Peggy Hill, appellants, challenge the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of appellants’ case. Appellants contend that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, they established a prima facie case on their claims of negligence, abandonment, and informed consent. They also argue that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ pretrial motions for partial summary judgment on their other multiple counts. 1 Discerning no error, we affirm.
We first discuss the trial judge’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lois Christian Amber Edens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Northwest, Inc. v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Khan v. Parsons Global Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Nader v. Democratic National CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.