Legal Opinion

Emmons v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided July 24, 1911No. 1,655PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Arthur C. Emmons against the United States. Judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

This action was commenced in 1889 to recover money paid to the United States.Dane! Office at Oregon City by plaintiff’s assignors as the purchase price and fees in entries oftim,ber land under the act of June 3, 1878, c. 151, 20 Stat. 89 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1545). A demurrer to the cojnplaint was sustained by Judge Hanford in 1890 upon the ground, among others, that while the United States would be liable in an action by an entryman, an assignee could not maintain the same. Emmons v. U. S. (C. C.) 42 Fed. 26. An amended complaint was subsequently filed and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Spofford v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. BuddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. DownieSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Emmons v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kingan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Ozanic v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Explosive Chemical Co. v. William S. Gray & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API