Legal Opinion

State v. Hewett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978No. 8PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

This appeal turns on answer to the following question: Is prejudicial error committed when the trial judge in his charge to the jury in a criminal case gives the contentions of the State but fails to give any contentions of defendant? The answer is yes.

It is the general rule that objections to the charge in reviewing the evidence and stating the contentions of the parties must be made before the jury retires so as to afford the trial judge an opportunity for correction; otherwise they are deemed to have been waived and will not be considered on appeal. State v. Virgil, 276…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API