Legal Opinion

State v. King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1962No. 722PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to quash the bill of indictment on the grounds hereinafter discussed.

It appears that at the March Term 1961 of the Superior Court of Alamance County a typewritten bill was sent to the grand jury charging that the defendant unlawfully, wilfully, and feloniously did commit the abominable and detestable crime against nature. A true bill was returned by the grand jury. The bill was quashed during the course of the defendant’s trial at the March Term 1961. It is admitted that such bill of indictment would not have supported a verdict in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. . JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API