Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1940No. Nos. 27359 and 27361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appears from the first cause of action in the amended petition of the relator The River Mining Company that it has contributed a large sum to the State Insurance Fund. The relator seeks to have a rate set up for its peculiar type of operation. It is averred that relator is engaged in coal mining, and mines by electrically powered equipment. The allegations do not even show whether relator's mines are underground or surface mines. From all that is contained therein the respondent was justified in refusing to set up a rate for the exact type of operation engaged in by relator. Under Section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dye Coal Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Midvale Coal Co. v. Cardox Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State ex rel. McHugh v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State ex rel. Superior Foundry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API