Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1942No. 28882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The specific question of law presented to the court upon argument of the demurrer to the petition is whether the Industrial Commission may apply to the relator's pay roll the premium rates applicable to a general contractor instead of the separate rates covering the various operations actually performed by his employees on the building which he has contracted to erect.

It is the contention of the relator that the actions of the commission in refusing to separately classify and rate the occupations of relator's employees "is unlawful and a violationof Section 35, Article II of the Constitution…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Powhatan Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Minutemen, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Roberds, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Cafaro Management Co. v. KielmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API