State ex rel. Superior Foundry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Respondent does not seriously contest the remedy of mandamus as chosen by relator, and this court has decided to accept jurisdiction and to dispose of the controversy on its merits. It is a matter of some importance, concerns the rights and status of a number of employers and employees, and involves an interpretation and application of statutory law.
In line with the allegations of the petition, relator contends, first, that the compensation award to Bobich was for a disability caused by a noncompensable occupational disease and *539was in violation of the second paragraph of Section 4123.68,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940