Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Eidemiller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. A8202-01192; CA A44575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

In this garnishment action, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), the garnishee, appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff $300,000.

Plaintiff had a judgment for $3 million on a medical malpractice claim. Continental controlled that litigation and appealed the judgment for its insured. We affirmed without opinion. 76 Or App 403, 708 P2d 1211 (1985), rev den 300 Or 562 (1986). Plaintiff then moved in this court for a 10% penalty for filing an appeal without probable cause. ORS 19.160. We allowed the motion and directed the trial court to enter a $300,000 penalty as part of the judgment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Snyder v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Satterfield v. SatterfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mortgage Bancorporation v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. EphremCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API