Hughes v. Ephrem
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
Plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing a writ of garnishment that they served upon H&B Jewelry & Loan Company (H&B). H&B, a pawnbrokering business, loaned plaintiffs’ debtor money, took a Rolex watch as collateral, and issued the debtor a pawn ticket. Plaintiffs obtained a writ of garnishment and sought to take possession of the watch after tendering the amount of the loan and the interest owed by the debtor. H&B moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ writ of garnishment, arguing that plaintiffs’ efforts were ineffective, first, because the debtor no longer had an ownership interest in the watch and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Oliver v. BurgOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Putnam v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Weinstein v. Watson, AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. BhattacharyyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020