Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Ephrem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 2016No. 110811164; A155125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing a writ of garnishment that they served upon H&B Jewelry & Loan Company (H&B). H&B, a pawnbrokering business, loaned plaintiffs’ debtor money, took a Rolex watch as collateral, and issued the debtor a pawn ticket. Plaintiffs obtained a writ of garnishment and sought to take possession of the watch after tendering the amount of the loan and the interest owed by the debtor. H&B moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ writ of garnishment, arguing that plaintiffs’ efforts were ineffective, first, because the debtor no longer had an ownership interest in the watch and,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Oliver v. BurgOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Putnam v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Weinstein v. Watson, AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. BhattacharyyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API