Silver v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This certified appeal concerns the relationship between General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 38a-369 (b),1 and rules 1.15 (b) and 1.6 (a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct2 governing the ethical *188obligations of attorneys. The defendant statewide grievance committee appealed upon our grant of certification from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which had concluded that the plaintiff attorney had no ethical duty under rules 1.15 (b) and 1.6 to notify his clients’ no-fault insurance carriers of certain personal injury settlement proceeds received by the plaintiff on behalf of two of his…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Silver v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lumber Mutual Insurance v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Silver v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
4Cited by3 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. DixonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rosenblit v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE TOWN OF LITCHFIELDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011