Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE TOWN OF LITCHFIELD
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendants, the housing authority of the town of Litchfield and D & H Property Management, LLC, appeal, on the granting of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which reversed the trial court’s denial of the motion of the complainant, Letitia Kilby, to intervene in an action brought by the plaintiff, the commission on human rights and opportu nities (commission), on behalf of the complainant. On appeal, the defendants claim that the Appellate Court improperly interpreted General Statutes § 46a-83 (d) (2) to permit the complainant to intervene. We conclude that we…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rieger Ex Rel. Rieger v. Altoona Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Sikand v. Wilson-CokerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Conservation Commission of Fairfield v. Red 11, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. CantillonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
- Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2026