Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.
Eliminating consideration of all non-essentials, the facts in this case are that Osceola Fertilizer Company, a corporation, sued T. Sol Beville, defendant, in an action in ejectment. The declaration being in the statutory form describing the following lands: “All that part lying West of the county road of the north, half (N%) of the south half (S%) of the northeast quarter (NE%) of the northwest quarter (NW1/^); all in section 11, township 49 south, range 42 east. ’ ’
The defendant entered three pleas to the declaration as follows: (1) The general issue; (2) adverse possession, and (3) a plea…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Baker v. . OakwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Harn v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Wade v. DoyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Warner v. GodingSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Holstun & Son v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Coates v. ColemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1947
- Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Crompton v. KirklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.