Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 21, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.

The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 Sou. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 Sou. 159; Davis v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 Sou. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason, 79 Fla. 619, 84 Sou. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville, 86 Fla. 479, 98 Sou.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Florida Power Co. v. CasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  4. Greenblatt v. J. R. Bissell Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. BevilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Farrior v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. York v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API