Legal Opinion

Bivens v. American Baler Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard A. Goldberg, J.

In this action to recover for damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff Calvin Bivens while operating a machine manufactured by the American Baler Company (American Baler), all parties stipulated to the admission pro hac vice of American Baler’s out-of-State counsel, Zelle & Larson. Defendant and third-party plaintiff BSE Corporation (BSE) now move to vacate the admission of American Baler’s out-of-State counsel pro hac vice, so as to bar them from representing American Baler for the purposes of pretrial discovery.

Pursuant to its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Johnson v. Mesch Engineering, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Largeteau v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neal v. Ecolab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API