Legal Opinion

Neal v. Ecolab, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Carpinello, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered November 19, 1997 in Ulster County, which denied defendant’s motion to admit pro hac vice two out-of-State attorneys.

After she allegedly sustained personal injuries while using a cleaning fluid manufactured by defendant, plaintiff commenced this action alleging causes of action sounding in negligence, strict products liability and breach of warranty. Issue was joined and over two years of discovery ensued with defendant being represented by two attorneys from a local law firm. Two weeks before trial was scheduled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Rogers & WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Baker v. WightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Bivens v. American Baler Co.New York Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of AnconaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Giannotti v. Mercedes Benz U.S.A., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Perkins v. ElbiliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Meckert v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API