Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mesch Engineering, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to admit pro hac vice out-of-State attorneys associated with a Washington, D.C., law firm specializing in products liability, negligence and breach of warranty claims that had represented defendants for several years in other matters. The court also properly denied plaintiff’s cross motion to prohibit those attorneys from participating in pretrial proceedings, including discovery. In our view, 22 NYCRR 520.9 (e) (1), which allows any court of record, at its discretion, to admit pro hac…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Largeteau v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LeslieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Bivens v. American Baler Co.New York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Johnson v. Mesch Engineering, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API