Legal Opinion

Seaton v. Seaton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 2011No. C064077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MAURO, J.

California law provides, with limited exceptions, that an individual can only be married to one person at a time. (Fam. Code, § 2201.)1 A bigamous marriage is void from the beginning. (Ibid.)

This case calls on us to determine whether Nevada law is the same as California law in this regard. We conclude that under both Nevada and California law, a bigamous marriage is void from its inception, even if it has not been declared void by a court.

*803Patricia L. Seaton appeals from a judgment nullifying her marriage with Jeffrey D. Seaton.2 The marriage was nullified under section 2201 on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garcia (In re Garcia), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. In the Matter of the Estate of Joaquin Cruz Leon GuerreroSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. Nicole v. LeftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Marriage of Lindskog CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Zhao v. Young CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API