Detjen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Petitioner (“Employee”) seeks review of an order granting reconsideration and decision after reconsideration of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (“Board”). We granted the petition for writ of review to examine the action of the Board in light of Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 11 Cal.3d 274 [113 Cal.Rptr. 162, 520 P.2d 978]. After mature reflection, we have concluded that the order and decision of the Board must be annulled.
For approximately five years, Employee was employed by Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. (“Employer”) as a chief PBX operator. Employer is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Nelson v. Associated Indemnity Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Jarosinski v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Motorola, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980