Legal Opinion
Jarosinski v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 2002No. 02CA0332PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
Claimant, Elzbieta Jarosinski, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) denying her petition to reopen. We affirm.
Claimant sustained an admitted work-related injury in November 1997 when she fell at work, striking her head and neck. Before that injury, she had a medical history of preexisting migraine headaches, dizziness, imbalance, and other problems. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the injury temporarily aggravated the migraine headaches and dizziness and authorized treatment for imbalance, visual problems, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- STANDARD METALS CORPORATION v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Chavez v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Excel Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Richards v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Employers Fire Insurance Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heinicke v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Associated Business Products v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kilpatrick v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Andrade v. IND. CLAIM APPEALS OFF. OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.