Motorola, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The sole issue in this review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether an industrial claimant’s admittedly stationary condition can be rendered unstationary because of the claimant’s reaction to a notice of claim status.
The facts giving rise to this issue are not in material dispute. On May 1, 1975, the respondent employee, Arlene O. Bowman, sustained an industrial injury which was diagnosed as a chronic back strain. Her industrial claim arising from this injury was accepted for benefits.
During the course of Mrs. Bowman’s treatment she was referred to Dr.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Keller Manufacturing Co. & Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. HokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Detjen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith and Sanders, Inc. v. PeeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Jarosinski v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002