Legal Opinion

Motorola, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 14, 1980No. 1 CA-IC 2069PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The sole issue in this review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether an industrial claimant’s admittedly stationary condition can be rendered unstationary because of the claimant’s reaction to a notice of claim status.

The facts giving rise to this issue are not in material dispute. On May 1, 1975, the respondent employee, Arlene O. Bowman, sustained an industrial injury which was diagnosed as a chronic back strain. Her industrial claim arising from this injury was accepted for benefits.

During the course of Mrs. Bowman’s treatment she was referred to Dr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Keller Manufacturing Co. & Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. HokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Detjen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith and Sanders, Inc. v. PeeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jarosinski v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API