Legal Opinion
Bidiman v. Gehrts
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 22, 1995No. 92C-10208; CA A82221PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*147EDMONDS, J.
In this claim for personal injury based on allegations of negligence, plaintiff appeals after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict and ruled that plaintiff did not prove that she was a business invitee. ORCP 60. We affirm.
On appeal from a judgment based on a directed verdict, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and extend to that party the benefit of every reasonable inference that may be drawn from the evidence. Shockey v. City of Portland, 313 Or 414, 837 P2d 505 (1992), cert den _US_, 113 S Ct 1813, 123 L Ed 2d 444…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Co-Gen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Walsh v. C & K MARKET, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Cassidy v. BonhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.