Faramelli v. Potomac Ins. Co., Etc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Parker,
By the pleadings and by stipulations of the parties made at the trial of this cause before a judge without a jury, the issue was narrowed to a question as to which of two insurance companies was liable to plaintiffs for a loss occasioned by the destruction of their frame building by fire. The court below entered judgment against The Potomac Insurance Company and that company has appealed. The judgment must be affirmed.
On May 1, 1937, the Bovard Agency, an agent authorized to solicit risks, collect premiums and issue or countersign policies of insurance for Potomac…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Scheel v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Pomerantz v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Lancashire Insurance v. NillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Coppola v. Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. Urban Mutual Fire Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.