Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Patrick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1953No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence under indictments charging forgery and burglary.

The defendant’s first allegation of error is that there was no severance of the four indictments for forgery and the single indictment for burglary, but that all were consolidated in one trial. The only reason advanced as an objection is that the evidence was insufficient to support each charge separately, but that the combined weight convinced the jury. There is no merit to this contention. The consolidation of indictments is within the sound discretion of the trial judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. NeumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. KaysierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. KaysierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. MargieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Bolish v. BanmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Com. Ex Rel. Lockhart v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Lockhart v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. RepyneckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API