Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kaysier

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1950No. Appeals, 305, 306 and 307PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant Mitchell Kaysier has appealed from three convictions of robbery, on each of which the court imposed a sentence of from 10 to 20 years, to be served consecutively. His principal complaint, in seeking a new trial, is that the court abused its discretion in consolidating the charges of the various indictments for trial.

Although there were sixteen indictments, they charged related offenses arising from the alleged criminal acts of the defendant with others, in but five instances on five separate occasions. The first of these was the burglary of a State Liquor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth v. MulroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. GROSSOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. KrzesniakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. SiliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. AckermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API