Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hickson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 2, 1986No. 51038; CM 444345PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial with members on charges of rape, sodomy, and adultery — all involving the same woman — in violation of Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, and 934, respectively. He pleaded guilty to adultery because, as he acknowledged during the providence inquiry, he had participated in sexual intercourse with a person married to someone other than himself; and a finding was entered pursuant to his plea. Hickson contested the rape for he claimed that intercourse had occurred with the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. CarrU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API