Legal Opinion
United States v. Izquierdo
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 10, 1999No. 98-0100/NAPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge COX
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue on this appeal is whether appellant’s sexual acts were sufficiently public in nature to constitute indecent acts, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. See 49 MJ 53 (1998). A general court-martial comprised of officer and enlisted members, sitting at Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida, convicted appellant of these offenses, contrary to his pleas.1
Appellant was initially charged with separate specifications of raping 2 different young women in his barracks room, in violation of Article 120,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. HicksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. GoingsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. TollinchiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. CastellanoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.