Little v. Fleishman
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by Fred W. Little and Jesse C. Little, co-partners doing business under the firm name of Little & Little, against A. Fleishman to recover broker’s commission.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.
Little & Little, real estate brokers, brought this action against Fleishman to recover their commission for the sale-of real estate. The terms of their agreement are contained in the following proposition submitted by Fleishman to Little & Little on the 3rd day of December, 1906: “Yon are given exclusive authority to sell for me the following described property,” situated in Salt Lake City, “for the sum of thirty-three thousand dollars upon the following terms, to wit, twenty-five hundred cash, bal. thirty days; and in the event of a sale at any price agreed upon I agree to pay the regular…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Lawrence v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Leete v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Smith v. SchieleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Hurt v. Sands CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Watson v. OdellUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Curtis v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Malone v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.