Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Findla

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. • The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, J.

From the pleadings and evidence in this case it appears that in September, 1862, the respondents were partners, doing business in the City of San Francisco as auctioneers and brokers, and that the appellant, who was the owner of a storehouse and lot of land in that city, employed them to advertise and sell this property for him. The contract between the parties was, in effect:

First—That the storehouse and lot should not be sold for a less sum than twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars.

Second—That if the property was sold for that sum only, *78the appellant would pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Monte AllegreSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Glentworth v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Merchants' Bank v. SpicerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Barnard v. MonnotNew York Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Love v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Woodward v. McCollumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API