Legal Opinion
Maleki v. Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 28, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0646PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 The commercial lease at issue in this case allowed the tenant to renew if he was “in compliance” with the lease. Consistent with Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann’s, Inc., 163 Ariz. 438, 788 P.2d 1189 (1990), we hold that an immaterial breach of the lease did not deprive the tenant of the power to renew.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Dr. Farzam Maleki entered into a five-year commercial lease with Desert Palms Professional Properties, L.L.C. (“Desert Palms”) on May 15, 2002. The lease stated the premises consisted of “approximately 1,500 square feet” and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. SourantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Bobrow v. BobrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.