Legal Opinion

Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 10-0635PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal and cross-appeal present several issues concerning the availability of equitable relief to remedy appellee Clay Sourant’s breaches of agreements with appellant Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP, and the trial court’s discretion to deny Sour-ant an award of attorney’s fees under the terms of these agreements. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions for additional proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 John Murphy (“Murphy”) and his wife are co-trustees of the Murphy Family Trust, which serves as the general partner in both…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Zancanaro v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Sirrah Enterprises LLC v. Wayne Wunderlich Et UxArizona Supreme Court · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API