Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1952No. Appeals, 227 and 228PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Drew,

The proper determination of this case rests on the application of Section 339 of the Restatement, Torts to the evidence presented at the trial. The learned trial judge held that plaintiff had failed to bring himself within the scope of that rule and accordingly entered a nonsuit. From an order denying a motion to remove the nonsuit, plaintiff has appealed.

On July 28, 1948, Edward Jennings, a minor then thirteen and a half years old, accompanied by several other boys, left his home in Hanover Township, Luzerne County, seeking work in Nanticoke Borough. Finding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Altenbach, Et Ux. v. Leh. Val. R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Prokop Et Ux. v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Mussolino Et Ux. v. Coxe Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Cooper v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API