Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1958No. Appeals, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175 and 176PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

The instant trespass actions were instituted by the appellant, Samuel Cooper, acting in a representative capacity as administrator of the estates of his two deceased sons, to recover damages arising from their accidental deaths by drowning. The appellees, the City of Reading and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, were named as defendants in the actions. The appellant’s complaint contained four counts and asserted a cause of action against the appellees in the case of each son under both the Death Act 1 and the Survival Act. 2 Neither appellee filed an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Gillespie v. McGowanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Casper v. Charles F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Wagner v. DoehringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Laform v. Bethlehem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bersani v. School District of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API