Legal Opinion

Altenbach, Et Ux. v. Leh. Val. R.R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1944PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for the defendant n. o v. or to grant a new trial, in an action of trespass for the death of a child.

The appellant constructed and maintained in a residential section of Easton for many years a reservoir to supply water and to furnish fire protection for its shops. It was constructed on an open lot bounded on the south by Wilkes-Barre Street, on the West by McKeen Street, on the North by Cooper Street and on the East by private premises. It had an area of 106 by 124 feet, and its greatest depth was about six feet. It was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Kay v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Barthold v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Murcelo v. H. I. Hettinger & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
  2. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Cooper v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API