Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 24, 2008No. Civ. 07-333-SLR, 07-348-SLR, 07-409-SLR, 07-765-SLRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently pending before the court are several motions in several related declaratory judgment patent actions. Plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, “BSC”) have filed four complaints against defendants Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Cordis Corporation (collectively, “J & J”), seeking a judgment that each of four J & J patents are invalid: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,217,286 (“the '7286 patent”) (Civ. No. 07-333, D.I. 1); 7,223,286 (“the '3286 patent”) (Civ. No. 07-348, D.I. 1); 7,229,473…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Operation: Heroes, Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- ARRIS Group Inc. v. Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Team Angry Filmworks, Inc. v. GeerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pearson v. CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.