Legal Opinion
State v. Sanguinetti
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 8, 1982No. 317-81PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
The defendant, owner of the Village Shoe Shoppe in Montpelier, was cited by the City of Montpelier in October, 1980, for violating Chapter 15, sections 514.4(2) and 514.6(1) of the Montpelier Zoning Ordinance, which bylaws prohibit projecting signs over the public right-of-way on that part of Main Street within the central business district, and provide that all nonconforming signs shall be removed within five years of November 6,1973.
In 1970, with the permission of the City, the defendant had erected a projecting sign on the face of the building in which his business is located. The sign…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Art Neon Co. v. The City and County of Denver, a Municipal Corporation, and Anthony H. Jansen, Gump Glass Co., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- City of Rutland v. KeifferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- P.F. Jurgs & Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Town of Brighton v. GriffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Chioffi v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.