Legal Opinion

City of Rutland v. Keiffer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 1, 1964No. 1049PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

This is a petition in chancery for a declaratory judgment to have determined the respective rights of the parties under certain provisions of the zoning ordinance and amendments of the plaintiff, City of Rutland.

The petition requested the court below to decide three questions.

1. (a). Whether the original zoning ordinance of the City of Rutland entitled “Municipal Zoning Ordinance of the City of Rutland, Vermont” enacted in 1948 applied to mobile home parks?(b). If so, in what manner?

2. (a). Whether the subsequent amendment to the original zoning ordinance entitled “Amendment to the Municipal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Mayor, Etc. of Borough of MoonachieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  3. Stoner McCray System v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. 2700 Irving Park Bldg. Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Trahan NovSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API