P.F. Jurgs & Co. v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The principal issue before the Court is whether defendants may be held liable for the tort of conversion, if defendants acted in good faith and without specific intent to deprive plaintiffs of property. We hold that they may, and affirm the judgment against defendant Thomas O’Brien, reverse the judgment in favor of defendants Thomas Shortle and O’Brien-Shortle Associates, and remand for entry and determination of damages.
The present controversy arose out of the dissolution of an accounting firm. The plaintiffs are P.F. Jurgs & Co., an accounting firm headquartered in Burlington, and certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Newport Sand & Gravel Co. v. Miller Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Economou v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- O'Bryan Const. Co., Inc. v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Lloyd's Credit Corp. v. Marlin Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Montgomery v. DevoidSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Barnett v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Roy v. MugfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Russin v. WessonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.