Legal Opinion

In Re McKean

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1927No. Docket No. 1375PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

— The petitioner, as the mother of three minor children, has applied for a writ of habeas corpus. In her petition she alleges that formerly she and C. J. McKean were husband and wife; that there were born as the issue of the marriage the three minor children above mentioned; that on the seventh day of May, 1926, the petitioner commenced an action for divorce; that the husband was duly served with summons and complaint, but that he did not appear and that his default was entered; that thereafter the divorce action came on for trial and an interlocutory decree was' entered on the twentieth day…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In Re LundbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex parte QueiroloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In Re De Lemos Ex Rel. SiddallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Thalheim v. Camp Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Messenkop v. DuffieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. In Re BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API