In Re McKean
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
— The petitioner, as the mother of three minor children, has applied for a writ of habeas corpus. In her petition she alleges that formerly she and C. J. McKean were husband and wife; that there were born as the issue of the marriage the three minor children above mentioned; that on the seventh day of May, 1926, the petitioner commenced an action for divorce; that the husband was duly served with summons and complaint, but that he did not appear and that his default was entered; that thereafter the divorce action came on for trial and an interlocutory decree was' entered on the twentieth day…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re LundbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex parte QueiroloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re De Lemos Ex Rel. SiddallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Thalheim v. Camp Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Messenkop v. DuffieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- In Re BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.