In Re De Lemos Ex Rel. Siddall
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Thomas Andrew Siddall, of the County of San Mateo. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This proceeding was. instituted by a petition by Julia K. de Lemos for writ of habeas corpus in which she avers that her infant son, Horace S. Siddall, seven years of age, is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by his father, Thomas Andrew Siddall, who was formerly petitioner’s husband, and prays that said infant be discharged from the alleged unlawful restraint of said Thomas Andrew Siddall and delivered over to the custody of the petitioner.
It appears that petitioner was divorced from said Thomas Andrew Siddall by a judgment rendered on the twenty-third day of February, 1897; and that by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex parte QueiroloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Prescott v. PrescottIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Sakraida v. SakraidaOregon Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.