Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. INTERMOUNTAIN, INC.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 4, 2010No. 20080835-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Presiding Judge:

1 Victor and Cindy Lawrence appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of Intermoun- tain Isuzu (Intermountain). They primarily argue that the trial court erroneously determined that they are liable for (1) conspiracy to defraud, (2) conversion, and (8) punitive damages. We affirm.

BACKGROUND 1

{2 In late 1999, A. Paul Schwenke, a business client of Mr. Lawrence, established cSave.net, LLC. Several months later, Schwenke decided to lease three vehicles for the personal use of his wife, his daughter, and the Lawrences. Mr. Lawrence helped Schwenke in this endeavor,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bonnie & Hyde, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  2. Nassi v. HatsisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  3. Macris v. Sevea International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Pyper v. ReilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Unified Container, LLC v. Mazuma Capital Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API