Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The appellant assigns as error the denial of its motion for judgment of nonsuit, interposed at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The ruling of the trial court on this motion must be sustained. The evidence offered would seem to entitle the plaintiff to have her case submitted to the jury. This is in accord with the decision of this Court in Saunders v. R. R., 185 N. C., 289. While in the Saunders case, supra, recovery for a similar injury was denied, the evidence here presented brings the instant case within the principle there set forth and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Saunders v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Mottu v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Herndon v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Hilton v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Spic & Span Dry CleanersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Brantley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API