Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

In considering this appeal we observe an utter want of any direct proof that the window, or either of its bolts or safety catches, was defective or that it was raised by an employee of the defendant. Neither the height to which the sash was raised nor the condition of the catches nor whether the raised sash was secured by the catches is ascertained. So there is no definite evidence as to what caused the window to fall and no evidence of negligence except the bare fact that it fell. The plaintiff therefore seeks to maintain her action by applying to the evidence the rule res ipsa loquitur. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Transportation Company v. DownerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Smith v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Briganti v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API