Hilton v. United States Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjbiam.
After the appeal in this action had been docketed in this Court, and after due notice to appellee, aj>pellant moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. This motion was heard upon affidavits filed by appellant in support of said motion, and by appellee in opposition thereto.
Upon the trial of the action in the Superior Court defendant relied chiefly upon its contention that the third issue should be answered by the jury in the affirmative. The court instructed the jury that there was no evidence in support of this contention, and that they should therefore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Mottu v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Boyd v. . LeatherwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Warwick v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937