Legal Opinion

Roland v. Markman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1929No. 39470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

— It appears that the plaintiff-appellee, who was engaged .in the business of buying potatoes in carload, lots and retailing'them to consuméis, purchased from the defendants-appellants, wholesale potato dealers, .on November 6, . 1926, a carload'of good, first-class. potatoes, screened, to be delivered f. o..b. Stockport. The purchase, price was on the basis of'$1.45 per bushel. Delivery was made November 16th. When appellee attempted to make' payment, he found that a sight draft attached to the bill of lading demanded a sum figured on the basis of.$l-.55 per bushel, .'instead' of $1.45, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loxtercamp v. Lininger Implement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Wind v. Iler & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Schopp v. C. C. Taft & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. McClarran v. Longdin-Brugger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Marx v. Locomobile Co. of AmericaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Reed v. BungerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. May Oil Burner Corp. v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. MORRIS PLAN LEASING COMPANY v. Bingham Feed and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API