Legal Opinion

May Oil Burner Corp. v. Munger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 19, 1930No. [No. 19, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

On or about March 25th, 1921, the May'Oil Burner Corporation, the appellant, entered into a written contract with Mrs. 0. A. Monger, the appellee, under which in consideration of $1,658 it agreed to install one May Automatic Oil Burner in each of two boilers located in the Peabody apartment house, which she owned, at Thirtieth and Calvert Streets-in Baltimore City. That contract in part provided that:

“It is understood that purchaser will have boiler, flues, and chimney clean, same to contain no obstruction or opening, and chimney he of sufficient capacity, as we assume no responsibility for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Hendler Creamery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Atlas Realty Co. v. GaltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. White Automobile Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. Griffin v. Metal Product Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Rittenhouse, Winterson Auto. Co. v. KissnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Burton v. Artery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Twombley v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Liber v. FlorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Potomac Edison Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API