Legal Opinion
Salgado v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1987No. 86-6293PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Eduardo Salgado (“Salgado”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his age discrimination claim under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA” or “The Act”) and his state common law causes of action in this employment discrimination case. The district court held that the state common law causes of action were preempted by the Act and the age discrimination claim was barred by the Act’s one-year time limit. We reverse and remand.
I. FACTS
This is an action for wrongful termination based on violations of state and federal age…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kathleen Hansen v. Ronald L. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Brothers Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Diana Estrada, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Bouman v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.