State v. Brent T. Novy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 55. (concurring). I write separately for two reasons. First, I disagree with the majority opinion's interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 971.23 to the undisputed facts in the present case. Second, I disagree with the majority opinion's approach to the second issue, namely the allegedly sleeping juror.
I
¶ 56. The majority opinion does not address the difficult issue of law facing the court, namely interpreting and applying the text of Wis. Stat. § 971.23 to the undisputed facts of the case. The majority opinion carefully reprints the text of the statute but then ignores the words…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.