Legal Opinion
State v. Stuart
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 2005No. 2001AP1345-CRPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The petitioner, Paul Stuart, seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming a judgment of conviction and order denying postconviction relief.1 Stuart was convicted in 1999 of first-degree intentional homicide for the shooting death of Gary Reagles. This is the third time that Stuart's case has come before this court.
¶ 2. Stuart now asks us to reexamine our decision in State v. Stuart, 2003 WI 73, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W.2d 82. There, we rejected his claim that the preliminary hearing testimony of his brother, who implicated Stuart in the murder, was improperly…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ManuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JorgensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.